i dont think that hdd install in the be all and end all. Hdd install generally means that it wont be used on other computers and therefore no point in running a live system, a non live system is a little smaller and faster and can be tailored to your specific hardware needs easier and ofc no need for a save file setup. Also a live system setup like pussy that doesnt ask for setup stuff like puppy does when it boots will only ever support 95% if hardware, its a crapshoot sometimes if it doesnt work it just doesnt work and nothing you can do about it.motorcity wrote:I'm not really certain if that's good or bad. Actually, I have no idea if "noobish" is called for in my situation sickgut.sickgut wrote: hdd install is never gonna be noobish
Here are some of my assumptions:
*Pussy is a miniaturized linux distro like Puppy, except it has a much more universal package management system. (witness hotROXpussy synaptic)
*Learning how you guys are squeezing and squashing an OS (any OS) down to it's component parts, could be very useful to a dedicated system.
*Pussy is no more inherently unsafe than any other linux because it is linux.
*Pussy should always be about portability; usb & dvd/cd & whatever comes next, the ability to plug-play-unplug-walkaway-plug & play, data & OS somewhere else is awesome!
Please note; I'm not trying to hijack this development or the conversation towards hdd install, it might leak out at times because of my outdated equipment and perhaps that leads to a question:
How dedicated should Pussy be to old stuff? I believe Puppy makes that something of importance, perhaps I'm wrong about Puppy? But is there a direction here where Pussy and Puppy differ?
if we where already beta quality i would have no hassles releasing pussy on distrowatch as a live linux distro that is made to run from cdrom. dvd or usb stick, ofc there are ways to turn the iso into a usb stick bootable thingy but i see it wise to keep the dd imagable .img version as it allows for better troubleshooting because the resulting USB stick is byte for byte, 0 and 1 identical to the master usb stick that it was made from.
debian is appealing to base pussy on as it is generally older, runs an older kernel and is well tested and stable, this is also better for older systems by its very nature as its really mostly about the older kernel that benefits older systems. the squeeze kernel is ancient compared to most other distros and because of debians very long support and release cycle, if you notice newer distros dont work on your older puter, but debian does, then you can feel safe in the knowledge that for the next 5 years or so you will be able to get support for the current stable debian that works on your computer. I see older system support is more important as who the f*** wants to pay actual money for a recent model computer every few years. The magic combo of a free OS running on a free computer system you scored because your picked it up from the side of the road before it rained is very appealing. Forcing an OS to be efficient is always good but older puters force us to do this.
pussy isnt a mini distro like puppy as everything is there, there arent any shortcuts taken to make it smaller. Only the compression of squashfs 4 and deleting unwanted files that do nothing make pussy small. It runs a full sized kernel with all available features. It is every bit as functional as any other debian. I think the similar application choice and desktop environment to puppy give the impression that pussy is also a mini distro but it really isnt.