ClamAv reports a malware in /usr/local/bin/pnscan

Using applications, configuring, problems
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
bpuppy
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue 25 Apr 2017, 13:03
Location: Quebec

ClamAv reports a malware in /usr/local/bin/pnscan

#1 Post by bpuppy »

As the title says, Clam Antivirus (32 bit version) reports:
/usr/local/bin/pnscan: Unix.Malware.Agent-7186126-0 FOUND.

It was reported on PuppyTahr v.6.0.5 (32-bit).
This may only be a false positive, but it would be interresting to investigate further...

Can anyone else check this on either the 32/64 bit versions?

bpuppy

User avatar
fabrice_035
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2014, 17:54
Location: Bretagne / France

#2 Post by fabrice_035 »

Hi,
From BionicPup64

Code: Select all

root# pnscan -V [PNScan, version 1.11 - Dec 11 2016 14:53:52]
Image

Compil today from https://github.com/ptrrkssn/pnscan

Code: Select all

root# ./pnscan -V
[PNScan, version 1.13 - Jun  8 2020 16:41:13]
Image

???
Bionicpup64-8.0 _ Kernel 5.4.27-64oz _ Asus Rog GL752

User avatar
6502coder
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon 23 Mar 2009, 18:07
Location: Western United States

#3 Post by 6502coder »

There's an apparently related thread on LinuxQuestions.org:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/question ... 175630929/

User avatar
perdido
Posts: 1528
Joined: Mon 09 Dec 2013, 16:29
Location: ¿Altair IV , Just north of Eeyore Junction.?

#4 Post by perdido »

Out of curiosity I downloaded 4 versions of tahr from the ibiblio repository
http://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/puppy-tahr/iso/

This is what clam says

tahr64-6.0.5.iso - /usr/local/bin/pnscan: Unix.Malware.Agent-6327832-0 FOUND
tahr-6.0.5_PAE.iso - /usr/local/bin/pnscan: Unix.Malware.Agent-7186126-0 FOUND
-------------------
Nothing found in either tahr 6.0.6 version
tahr-6.0.6-uefi.iso was clean
tahr64-6.0.6-uefi.iso was clean
###############################################
I also scanned the latest bionicpups 64-bit & 32-bit

bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso - /usr/local/bin/pnscan: Unix.Malware.Agent-7186126-0 FOUND
-------------------
bionicpup32-8.0-uefi.iso was clean.

This could be false positives but who knows? I sure don't.
This post is for informational purposes only. You make your own determinations.

Have fun!

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#5 Post by rcrsn51 »

The latest versions of PeasyPort have eliminated pnscan in favour of a different scanning tool.

User avatar
Smithy
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon 12 Dec 2011, 11:17

#6 Post by Smithy »

/usr/sbin/mpscan
/usr/bin/pscan
/usr/bin/ipsort
/usr/bin/pnscan
root/packages/builtin_files/pnscan
root/packages/builtin_files/file_sharing-curlftpfs-mpscan

Tried a ClamwinScan as an alternative, Didn't find anything suspect in Artfulpup. I am guessing it will be the same in Tahrpup and Bionic.

that pscan file is a symbolic link to busybox, 703kb or 17bytes depending on where you look.
Attachments
puppy-scan.png
(41.05 KiB) Downloaded 120 times

User avatar
666philb
Posts: 3615
Joined: Sun 07 Feb 2010, 12:27
Location: wales ... by the sea

#7 Post by 666philb »

hi,
this was also mentioned on the bionicpup64 thread.
i think the 32bit pnscan in /usr/local/bin got into the distro by woofce grabbing the wrong peasyport.pet which includes pnscan.

interestingly the 64bit pnscan (which is the official ubuntu version) in /usr/bin is also detected as malware when uploaded to virustotal, although clamav misses it.

it seems that it can be used as a hacktool and is not malware in itself. see this post at pnscans github page https://github.com/ptrrkssn/pnscan/issues/2
Bionicpup64 built with bionic beaver packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=114311
Xenialpup64, built with xenial xerus packages http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=107331

User avatar
bpuppy
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue 25 Apr 2017, 13:03
Location: Quebec

follow up

#8 Post by bpuppy »

This is indeed interesting.
Being so controversial, I wonder whether new Puppy derivatives should include it in their next versions...

User avatar
rcrsn51
Posts: 13096
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 13:50
Location: Stratford, Ontario

#9 Post by rcrsn51 »

I have PeasyPort v3.1 in PET form which removes pnscan. If anyone wants to participate in testing, I will post it.

Post Reply