Puppy '.pet' Packages

Message

Bernie_by_the_Sea · #41 Post by **Bernie_by_the_Sea** » Thu 24 Mar 2011, 20:29

postfs1 wrote: If the strange, active kid who is in search of remote machines does exist, then the closed door is not a bad solution i think.

You really think a closed door is going to keep an intruder out? If all the doors are closed then nothing from the web can get in. If anything is allowed in, then there's always some way to hitch a ride on what comes through that door.

Bernie_by_the_Sea · #42 Post by **Bernie_by_the_Sea** » Thu 24 Mar 2011, 20:56

Py wrote: Wondering how to save a pet?

I usually get pets with SeaMonkey (or other browser), not Quickpet.

postfs1 · #43 Post by **postfs1** » Thu 24 Mar 2011, 22:54

To reedit up to date.

GustavoYz · #44 Post by **GustavoYz** » Fri 25 Mar 2011, 04:48

Bernie_by_the_Sea wrote:
Py wrote: Wondering how to save a pet?
I usually get pets with SeaMonkey (or other browser), not Quickpet.

Pornview.pet?

Bernie_by_the_Sea · #45 Post by **Bernie_by_the_Sea** » Fri 25 Mar 2011, 10:38

GustavoYz wrote: Pornview.pet?

Yeah, it's from ttuuxxx and available in this forum.

http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewto ... &start=622

Great name

#46 Post by **ttuuxxx** » Sat 26 Mar 2011, 17:10

LoL Guys, I do not indorse that name, but it is a good image viewer . Not for that I support those type of images, just your run of mill jpg's etc
ttuuxxx

Bernie_by_the_Sea · #47 Post by **Bernie_by_the_Sea** » Sat 26 Mar 2011, 18:02

With a fresh pristine Wary I can now be online in 78 seconds. Again not bad going from 200 hours to just over a minute. I think I can get it below a minute.

jon4t2 · #48 Post by **jon4t2** » Tue 31 May 2011, 12:29

yorkiesnorkie wrote:I've been using Puppy for several years now and never found a virus on my Puppy Linux frugal install. [snip]

So having withstood the test of time Puppy Linux seems pretty bullet proof to me, even though we run as root.

Not bullet proof. Just never attacked.

If a house has no locks on its doors and it has never been burgled, one cannot conclude that the house is secure, just that it has not been burgled.

Jasper · #49 Post by **Jasper** » Wed 01 Jun 2011, 11:12

Not bullet proof. Just never attacked.

Or significantly more likely,

attacked, but not pierced.

myke · #50 Post by **myke** » Wed 01 Jun 2011, 14:43

Jasper, I disagree. Go to:
http://www.grc.com/stevegibson.htm#projects

and you will see that Puppy Linux does very well. If you have Windows, run the same test from Windows and you'll see the difference in security.

abushcrafter · #51 Post by **abushcrafter** » Wed 01 Jun 2011, 21:45

jon4t2 wrote:
yorkiesnorkie wrote:I've been using Puppy for several years now and never found a virus on my Puppy Linux frugal install. [snip]

So having withstood the test of time Puppy Linux seems pretty bullet proof to me, even though we run as root.
Not bullet proof. Just never attacked.

If a house has no locks on its doors and it has never been burgled, one cannot conclude that the house is secure, just that it has not been burgled.

+1.

sszindian · #52 Post by **sszindian** » Thu 02 Jun 2011, 01:45

If you would like to know just how secure your computer and Internet activity is, click on this site. They check you out and give you a nice detailed report! This will tell you what you have to evaluate in your system to 'try' to get more secure.

http://ip-check.info?lang=en

>>>---Indian------>[/url]

sszindian · #53 Post by **sszindian** » Thu 02 Jun 2011, 01:58

It seems previous post here didn't't take! We'll try again.

If you want to see just how secure your system is go to this URL and run a check!

http://ip-check.info?lang=en

>>>---Indian------>

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

(old)Puppy Linux Discussion Forum

Puppy '.pet' Packages

Re: Hypothetical Situation Paranoia

Re: Hypothetical Situation Paranoia

How Secure Are You?

Post not taking?