I have tested on another machine running Racy 5.5 and BK's pet works with https. As I suggested earlier I think this is a security protocol issue because I vaguely remember updating libssl manually on this second machine.
What baffles me is why Barry found he needed to change connection to https ...
Search found 761 matches
- Sun 08 Mar 2015, 09:27
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: GetFlash install Flashplayer
- Replies: 186
- Views: 272985
- Sat 07 Mar 2015, 16:52
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: GetFlash install Flashplayer
- Replies: 186
- Views: 272985
Confirmed that BK's updated getflash does not work on Racy. Barry has changed url to https at line 26. Possibly server terminates connection because it does not like security protocol offered.
If you have a problem with your version of Puppy change back to http in line 26 in /usr/sbin/getflash and ...
If you have a problem with your version of Puppy change back to http in line 26 in /usr/sbin/getflash and ...
- Wed 04 Feb 2015, 16:54
- Forum: Truly off-topic conversations
- Topic: Microsoft and Google paid Ad Block Plus for whitelisting ?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 936
- Sat 31 Jan 2015, 10:03
- Forum: REQUESTS
- Topic: Will Vivaldi browser run in Puppy?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7273
Vivaldi will probably be the best Chromium based browser eventually given the track record of the ex-developers of classic Opera. However, at present only a 64bit version is available. If you an old Opera fan and have a 64bit Linux OS you will certainly be interested.
https://vivaldi.com
Even if ...
https://vivaldi.com
Even if ...
- Wed 24 Dec 2014, 14:32
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Classic Opera browser 12.16 [SFS] for Wary and Racy.etc
- Replies: 182
- Views: 158777
- Thu 23 Oct 2014, 06:09
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Classic Opera browser 12.16 [SFS] for Wary and Racy.etc
- Replies: 182
- Views: 158777
Hi Griot. Yes, this has always been a problem with Opera. I gave up trying to find a solution. Maybe Opera deliberately analyzes content as a security feature and identifies .pet as .gz file content.
I never thought it was a major problem because it is so easy to change the file extension when the ...
I never thought it was a major problem because it is so easy to change the file extension when the ...
- Wed 01 Oct 2014, 14:46
- Forum: Security
- Topic: BASH exposure expressed as bigger than Heartbleed<SOLUTIONS>
- Replies: 185
- Views: 132922
There are still Vulnerabilities with bash, my build has 2, can everyone that built packages run this in a terminal curl https://shellshocker.net/shellshock_test.sh | bash
Using the shellshocker.net test there are still 2 vulnerabilities in mavrothal's 3.0.19-i486.1.pet for Racy: CVE-2014-7186 and ...
Using the shellshocker.net test there are still 2 vulnerabilities in mavrothal's 3.0.19-i486.1.pet for Racy: CVE-2014-7186 and ...
- Fri 26 Sep 2014, 10:02
- Forum: Security
- Topic: BASH exposure expressed as bigger than Heartbleed<SOLUTIONS>
- Replies: 185
- Views: 132922
Re: bash 3.0.17 for wary/racy
Thanks mavrothal. Works for me without any problems. Great to see Racy/Wary being supported with security patches.mavrothal wrote:For those with wary/racy here is bash 3.0.17 compiled from BK's source and the gnu patch, in Racy 5.5

- Wed 03 Sep 2014, 18:06
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Classic Opera browser 12.16 [SFS] for Wary and Racy.etc
- Replies: 182
- Views: 158777
- Mon 14 Jul 2014, 13:24
- Forum: Users ( For the regulars )
- Topic: Share file via wifi with my android device
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2145
- Sat 12 Apr 2014, 05:52
- Forum: Security
- Topic: OpenSSL software risk
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6609
- Fri 11 Apr 2014, 06:30
- Forum: Security
- Topic: OpenSSL software risk
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6609
- Fri 11 Apr 2014, 03:57
- Forum: Security
- Topic: OpenSSL software risk
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6609
- Thu 10 Apr 2014, 14:57
- Forum: Security
- Topic: OpenSSL software risk
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6609
- Sat 08 Mar 2014, 07:15
- Forum: Security
- Topic: How to patch libgnutls26?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2528
- Mon 17 Feb 2014, 06:17
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Disappointed with the speed of recent Seamonkeys?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6763
As a following comment noted it is possible to filter in a different way but for most users unless an add-on is offered that manages that - they will be stuck with those "recommendations" (think "revenue enhancement" as a slick repackaging for "tax increase").
So while AdBlock will still work, if ...
- Sun 16 Feb 2014, 14:05
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Disappointed with the speed of recent Seamonkeys?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6763
The article is a re-write of the Mozilla statement . There is no mention of blocking AdBlock.edoc wrote:Our 18yr old IT major son was the one who told me about the FF changes - he sent me this link as his source:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi ... to-Firefox
- Sat 15 Feb 2014, 09:03
- Forum: Browsers and Internet
- Topic: Disappointed with the speed of recent Seamonkeys?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 6763
- Mon 03 Feb 2014, 07:30
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Latest version of Pup Advert Blocker is...?? [Solved]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4267
- Sun 02 Feb 2014, 15:43
- Forum: Beginners Help ( Start Here)
- Topic: Latest version of Pup Advert Blocker is...?? [Solved]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4267